ADEQ Issues Air Permit for Coal-Fired Electric PLant

They tried to build several in Texas but were stopped, so they came to Arkansas. Another in planning stage for Northeast Arkansas and Oklahoma. There are concerns the OK plant will drift over the Ozarks. Note there is no limit on CO2 emissions.

ADEQ ISSUES AIR PERMIT FOR COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC PLANT

The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has approved a final air permit for construction and operation of a coal-fired electric power plant in Hempstead County. The permit, signed November 5, was issued to Southwest Electric Power Co. (SWEPCO), a unit of American Electric Power (AEP) for construction of the John W. Turk, Jr., generating plant near Fulton.

The permit application had been under review by the ADEQ for more than two years, and was the subject of two public hearings and two separate public comment periods totaling more than three months, during which hundreds of interested parties offered comments on the proposed permit.

“This is a complex and controversial permit application,” ADEQ Director Teresa Marks said. “It has undergone a lengthy review by technical and legal personnel to make sure the permit is protective of public health and the environment by conforming to all applicable air emission standards under state and federal laws.”

The main steam generating unit consists of one ultra-supercritical pulverized coal boiler fueled by low sulfur coal and natural gas which will power a single steam turbine designed for base load operation with a nominal net power output of 600 megawatts.

The permit contains emission limits for such pollutants as particulates, sulfur dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and mercury. There are no limits in the permit for carbon dioxide (CO2), which currently is not subject to emission limits under federal or state regulations.

However, the Turk plant design includes a 20-acre area for the inclusion of CO2 capture equipment, should future regulations impose CO2 emission limits.

“It is quite possible CO2 emission standards will be adopted at the federal level and in Arkansas as well in a few years,” Marks noted. “The ADEQ and the operators of all permitted coal-fired electric plants in the state--as well as a variety of other industrial and commercial operations with significant CO2 emissions--are aware of this possibility and are already considering options to address the issue of CO2 emissions as quickly as possible once standards are in place.”

Currently, Arkansas has six permitted coal-fired electric generating units; two near Redfield in Jefferson County, two near Batesville in Independence County, one near Gentry in Benton County, and one near Osceola in Mississippi County.

A fact sheet with additional information about the Turk Plant permit is available on the ADEQ internet web site, www.adeq.state.ar.us, in the “Hot Topics” box on the right-hand side of the web site home page.

Tammi Trotter Receives Clean Water – Stronger Communities Volunteer Award

TAMMI TROTTER AWARDED BY STATE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK

Little Rock, Ark. – Nov. 1, 2008 – Tammi Trotter, leader of the Friends of the Mill and Piney Creeks environmental organization, was today given the “Clean Water – Stronger Communities Volunteer Award” of the Arkansas Watershed Advisory Group (AWAG), a part of the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The award was presented at a ceremony held at the Hilton Little Rock Metro Center in conjunction with the 2008 AWAG conference.
Trotter helped found and organize the Friends of the Mill and Piney Creeks just months ago in an effort to curb and correct significant environmental damage on Mill Creek and the Piney Creek below it, caused at least in part according to ADEQ, by the unpermitted mining activity of B&H Resources, LLC., a company co-owned by George Bartmess of the Brockwell area.
Trotter’s leadership resulted in the issuance of an emergency order from ADEQ to B&H Resources to halt activity. ADEQ is also demanding from B&H Resources a plan for remediation of damage done.
Media throughout the state have covered the conflict and a groundswell of public support for the Friends organization has occurred.
Mill Creek and Piney Creek, both completely contained in Izard County, are two of the most beautiful streams in Arkansas. They are small streams with towering bluffs dotting their banks and are frequently visited by nature lovers, fishermen and others seeking to enjoy their beauty.
Trotter lives with her family at the mouth of Mill Creek where it flows into Piney Creek. She was alerted to the environmental damage when the gravel stream bottom near her home was suddenly inundated with several feet of silt. She decided to alert neighboring property owners, some of whom live in different counties and even in different states. Still, Trotter managed to contact those owners and in June held in a meadow near her home the first meeting of what that day became the Friends of the Mill and Piney Creeks. Nearly 40 people attended – many of whom had never before met but who shared the goal of protecting the creeks.
Working with this group, Trotter successfully alerted ADEQ staff about the damage, leading to several investigations by them and the resulting emergency order.
At Trotter’s invitation and encouragement, ADEQ Director Teresa Marks personally visited the damaged area on August 27 and spoke to a group of 75 concerned citizens at the Calico Rock Music Hall.
Trotter remains vigilant and watchful about environmentally-adverse activities along the creeks. Friends of the Mill and Piney Creeks is now a vibrant organization holding meetings and conducting activities on a regular basis.
___________________________________________

Congratulations Tammi and everyone with the group for this well deserved award! We are so proud of you!

Call for better EPA/States relationships

A comment... almost everything Arkansas does to protect water is required by the Feds through the EPA and the Clean Water Act. In fact, the EPA has delegated many of their programs, including stormwater regulation, to Arkansas. From what I hear, the relationship could use some work.

Point source pollution (stuff coming out of a pipe) has been regulated for some time, but "non-point source pollution" (runoff) has no teeth. All the programs are "studies" and planning for education and encouragement of voluntary actions. I support that approach, however, there should be some minimum base regulation and enforcement.

Gene

The Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators has just released the final version of a document entitled "Call for Change-Water Quality Improvements for the 21st Century."
The document addresses the need to improve the working relationship between EPA and the states as well as more specific programmatic issues. It looks like we have some similar ideas. The document can be found here:
http://www.asiwpca.org/home/cfc.htm

Documentary on Buffalo River to show in Fayetteville and Little Rock

Dear all,

As you know, the Buffalo is in our watershed. We do not focus on the Buffalo, but work closely with the Ozark Society who is focused on that beautiful stream.

Here's a note from Debbie Doss with the Canoe Club on an upcoming documentary. Debbie and the club have been big supporters of our efforts.
Gene

Two more screenings of the documentary, The Buffalo Flows, have been announced. Arkansas Canoe Club members are featured in the film and I must say, we were pleased with the way it has turned out.

The first screening is in Fayetteville on Nov. 14 at the U of A.
Get the details here:

http://www.uark.edu/depts/jourinfo/publ ... ews/?p=112

The second is at the Cinton School in Little Rock on Nov. 20th. You will need to call them in order to reserve a seat.

Get the details here:

http://www.clintonschool.uasys.edu/news ... spx?id=485

Thanks, Debbie

WATER POLLUTION: Court rules EPA must set stormwater limits for construction industry (09/19/2008)

WATER POLLUTION: Court rules EPA must set stormwater limits for
construction industry (09/19/2008)


;
Katherine Boyle, Greenwire reporter

A federal appeals court yesterday upheld a lower court decision
requiring U.S. EPA to set standards to control stormwater pollution from
strip malls, subdivisions and other new developments by Dec. 1, 2009.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Natural Resources
Defense Council and the Waterkeeper Alliance, ruling EPA must promulgate
effluent limitation guidelines and new source performance standards for
stormwater pollution discharges caused by the construction and
development industry.

The states of Connecticut and New York supported NRDC and the alliance
in the case.

NRDC and the alliance predicted the court's decision would prevent beach
closings, waterborne disease, flooding, fish kills and contamination of
drinking water supplies.

"This decision will go a long way toward protecting America's streams
and rivers from the construction and development industry," said Melanie
Shepherdson, a staff attorney at NRDC. "The court made it very clear
that EPA can't just shirk its responsibilities to rein in pollution from
this industry."

EPA spokesman Nick Butterfield said making sure the nation's coastlines
and watersheds remain vibrant and healthy is a top priority for the
agency. He noted that EPA is currently working on a new clean water
regulation to reduce runoff pollution from construction sites, as the
court ordered.

When EPA appealed the 2006 U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California decision, the agency argued that the annual cost of
proposed effluent standards would be more than half a billion dollars
and would result in job displacement. EPA also noted that existing
permit programs could control 80 percent to 90 percent of sediment
runoff.

Additionally, EPA argued that the definition of "new source" should not
include construction sites.

The National Association of Home Builders intervened in the case on
behalf of EPA. The homebuilders have said a rule placing a numerical
limit on stormwater runoff would pose problems for the construction
industry because it is impossible to predict how much it will rain
during a project.

NRDC and the alliance argued that EPA's failure to promulgate stormwater
standards after listing the construction industry as a point source
violated the Clean Water Act.

EPA originally predicted that a final stormwater rule could come out
this year but now says it will not be released until 2009. The agency is
delaying the rule in order to convene an advisory panel that will
examine the economic impact it could have on small businesses, despite
previously concluding a panel would not be necessary.

EPA said it expects to publish a proposed rule by Dec. 1, 2008, and is
still on track to finalize the rule by Dec. 1, 2009, the court-ordered
deadline (Greenwire
; , Aug. 19).

Click here ; to read the
court's decision.

Low Dissolved Oxygen Stocking Requirements

From Jeff Williams

Hello All,

Although the high precipitation earlier this year and the resulting high flows
from the dams have had some positive effects on the trout fisheries in the White
and North Fork Rivers, these conditions have resulted in some of the lowest
dissolved oxygen levels observed on these waters. When the dissolved oxygen
levels began to drop below the state standard of 6.0 mg/l, the Corps of
Engineers blocked open the turbine vents to allow more air to be entrained.
This helped some, but as the season progressed the dissolved oxygen levels began
to approach 4.0 mg/l. The Corps and Southwest Power instituted maximum loading
restrictions on the turbine releases from the dams. This basically means that
they are putting less water through the turbines to allow greater aeration.
This helped to bring the dissolved oxygen levels back up and for that reason we
continued to stock trout in all areas in an effort to maintain a satisfactory
fishery. During this time we closely monitored the water quality situation and
collected field samples to determine the extent to which sub-standard dissolved
oxygen levels reached below the dams. However, the dissolved oxygen levels have
continued to drop and despite the turbine venting and loading restrictions we
are now seeing readings approach 3.0 mg/l. This is a threshold level where we
could begin to see trout mortality and for that reason we have recommended to
cease stocking in areas affected by low dissolved oxygen. Field samples taken
earlier this week have shown that at the current flows the dissolved oxygen is
not recovering to 6.0 mg/l until just above Rim Shoals on the White and until
the bottom of the catch-and-release area on the North Fork. Therefore, we will
cease stocking trout from the dam down to Cotter on the White and will only
stock at Rose's Dock on the North Fork until conditions improve.

It should be noted that the fish that were scheduled for the affected areas will
be held at the Jim Hinkle/Spring River Hatchery to be stocked in those areas
when conditions improve. I realize the impact that these restrictions may have
on many of you, however, this is a very unusual year. In fact, we have also
instituted stocking restriction on the upper 6 miles of the Little Red for the
first time ever.

I have attached a copy of the memos in which we recommended the stocking
restrictions. Please let me know if you have any questions at all. Thanks.

Jeff

<> <Restriction Memo 10-2-08.doc>> http://webmail.aol.com/39155/aol/en-us/Mail/get-attachment.aspx?uid=1.23817789&folder=NewMail&partId=2&saveAs=Bull_Shoals_TW_Stocking_Restriction_Memo_10-6-08.doc


Jeffrey S. Williams
Trout Management Supervisor
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission
201 East 5th Street
Mountain Home, AR 72653
Phone: (870) 424-5924
Fax: (870) 425-6596
j_williams@agfc.state.ar.us

Low Impact Development

Low Impact Development (LID) is all about protecting rivers and lakes. The whole idea is to encourage the natural cycle of water - so rainwater soaks into the ground to be filtered by the soil and used by the plants rather than running over the ground as it runs down hill to the river and lake. As storm water runs across the ground, it also picks up debris, silt, chemicals and other pollutants and carries them directly to lakes and rivers. Silt and sediment are some of the biggest polluters because they choke streams, fish and aquatic life. Encouraging the natural cycle keeps silt and also pollution out of the water and promotes a healthy water environment for fish and humans. In our own area, fish have disappeared from a mile long stretch of Mill Creek in Izard County because the stream bank was cleared without erosion control measures and silt clogged the creek bed.

Another benefit is that not all the rainfall reaches the river in a short period of time. This means that the river doesn’t rise as much or so fast which means there is less bank erosion. It also means the groundwater reaches the river slowly so there is more “recharge”. The river is replenished by ground water even when there is no rainfall because it takes a while for the water to move through the soil and rock.

Development refers to anything people do that impacts the environment. Any time land is paved or a building built, less water can get into the ground. That means more run off. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a typical city block generates five times more run off than a wooded area of the same size because there are so many hard surfaces that block water from soaking into the ground.

“What I do doesn’t make much difference”

Well, yes it does. There are many small ways we all contribute to environmental degradation, but there are many easy things we can do to encourage the natural water cycle that all together make a big difference. Rain barrels catch rain water from roofs that can be used later to water landscaping. Rain gardens are landscaped areas that are slightly depressed so rain water pools so it can be used by the plants or soak into the ground. If properly done, the water soaks is gone before mosquitoes can breed.

Improving landscaping can make a big difference. Trees and shrubs catch and absorb more rain water than grass. Grass absorbs more than bare dirt or rock. Another thing we can do is find ways to slow water down as it travels across the ground. Taking some of the energy out of the flow will decrease the amount of dirt carried away – and in our rocky area, we need all the soil we can get. Don’t over water and use pesticides and herbicides sparingly. Dispose of litter, household and yard waste, and hazardous materials properly.

Another LID strategy is to make sure our septic tanks are inspected and pumped regularly to ensure it is functioning properly. Just because the toilet flushes doesn’t mean that the sewerage is being properly treated. The state of Missouri estimates that 70% of the state’s septic tanks don’t function properly. That’s scary. The Bull Shoals area and northern Arkansas has the same kind of rocky “karst” ground as much of Missouri. In many places, traditional septic tanks can’t work. However, new septic tank technology that works much better is available.